Work language check: Upper-Intermediate 56% → 67%, Advanced 0% → 20%. (Zoom's AI level estimate is noise — ignore it.)
The single biggest note, repeated for months. The gap isn't knowledge, it's retrieval under time pressure — asked to use the odds are that, I could recite it and not build a sentence round it. On 20 Aug the same thing happened with at the eleventh hour and in the nick of time: both are in the glossary under Time pressure, and "in the last minutes" was the best I produced. 8 Oct: a full trip story in small talk, activation phrases unused for the third lesson running — and aptitude, taught 13 Aug, missed for the third time.
Fix: Pick two phrases from the activation list before class and force them into small talk. On 20 Aug this didn't happen — twelve minutes of small talk, both chosen phrases unused. The drill only counts if it's said out loud in the first five minutes.
tired knees, knee fatigue, SUP boards, sub boards. On 20 Aug: "boring, lifelong discussions" for long-winded, "relaxation" for a relief, "track the delivers" for deliverables.
Fix: When the word is missing, describe the thing — "the pain you get a day after training". That also gets the right word handed back to me.
Told big experience was wrong, I offered huge, then extremely big. The answer was extensive.
Fix: A rejected collocation needs a different adjective, not a bigger adverb.
"It's undoubtedly that you have to present" · "It's significant that we need to do work".
Fix: If it ends in -ly, it can't be the complement of it is.
"I'm kind of detective" · "real assets to your company". Not a knowledge gap — a fluency-cost gap, always the same slot. 8 Oct: "Dasha is positive person."
Fix: a/an before a singular job title or role noun. Slow down one beat at the noun.
"super vital" · "It's absolutely essential that you have to watch".
Fix: When the adjective already carries the force, keep the rest of the clause plain.
Andriana asked for the colloquial occasional; the answer, the odd comment, was on the page. Recognising odd = strange shut the search down, and I spent three minutes arguing that odd couldn't mean that. Same shape as the be down to hunt in the same lesson: I had because of and due to, so I stopped looking for the informal one. On 17 Sep, the same shape again in reverse: elevate felt close enough to alleviate that I reached for it twice (boredom, then a personal example) without checking the two actually mean different things. 8 Oct, three more: exaggerate for exacerbate, cut and dried for cut out for (not caught in class), manifest for manifesto.
Fix: When a familiar word sits in a slot that doesn't fit, the word is right and my meaning is wrong. Assume a second sense before rejecting it — and when asked for colloquial, don't offer anything I'd write in an email. Same discipline applies to near-miss word pairs: check the meaning matches before reaching for the word that merely sounds close.
Converting active to passive, I don’t always map the exact tense — under time pressure I reach for a “stronger”-feeling form instead of the matching one. On 21 Sep: given a present simple sentence (“they take the photos”), I answered with continuous (“are being taken”); given a past simple sentence (“they took the photos”), I answered with present perfect (“have been taken”). Same shape again in a sequential past narrative (“the security department was informed… and used…”) that needed plain past simple but kept pulling toward present/past perfect.
Fix: Name the active sentence’s exact tense out loud before answering — the passive keeps that same tense, it doesn’t add perfect or continuous aspect for emphasis.
A Ukrainian word with an English lookalike gets used with its Ukrainian meaning. On 8 Oct: "in their cadence" (from «каденція») for term of office. In English, cadence is rhythm, like steps per minute in running.
Fix: When an English word comes to mind because it sounds like the Ukrainian one, treat it as suspect — check it, or describe the thing instead ("the four years they're in power").